write2kill.in
 
write2kill on Facebook
Random articles

What's in a name?

Hitler and the monster
With the stage set for the February 15 Assembly polls in the Northeast, a surfeit of names crop up that extend from the ordinary to the bizarre. There are namesakes and names for names' sake. Adolf Hitler, for once, is not a member of the German National Socialist Party. He is not a protagonist of Nazism either for anybody to be alarmed of but just the Congress(I) nominee for the Rangsakona (ST) seat in Meghalaya. Adolf Hitler R Marak is his full name. The Great Dictator of the Third Reich is not the only fiend to contest in the ensuing elections in the state. The very name of a candidate for the Mendipather (ST) constituency would send a shiver down the spine of one too many. One was told that Mary Shelley's monster did destroy its creator. But Frankenstein is alive and kicking for he (Frankenstein W Momin) is the Congress(I) man out here. Continue reading

Retelling India’s fashion story

Indian fashion
There’s a beeline for India – from publishers of magazines and newspapers to manufacturers of garments and textiles. Not quite without reason – its ever-growing affluent section is bigger in numbers than many European nations put together. If you care to look beyond the obvious, you will realise those making this beeline have not just been taken in by speculative hype alone. Numbers scream realities, and the numbers indicate that the Indian fashion market is huge, it is growing, it is vibrant. The rich are getting richer, and the number of the rich is also increasing at an alluring rate. This lure is for all those who see India as the promised land for fashion and retail. So what is it with fashion in India? What is it with sportswear in this country? Continue reading
 

If you are a Bong, you must love fish

• Date published: August 28, 2008
• Sections:
n/a
Howrah breeze

In the last week of June, when a young Naga woman in New Delhi was denied entry into the pretentiously titled club called Urban Pind, the talk of the town became all about racial profiling. The issue was still raging fire when animal rights activist Ambika Shukla scribbled an obnoxious canine caper in some newspaper about what she derisively thought about Nagas and “other Northeasterners” relishing dog meat. And all this after the Times of India, in March, apologised for carrying a piece underlined by a reprehensibly racist remark about women from the Northeast in an article on spas. For some reason, perhaps for all good reason, all the incidents were related to the Northeast.

Now, that’s one kind of racial profiling that will always leave you seething in anger. Yet, there are other kinds (i.e profiling of people from other parts of the country) that amuse you as well. Irritate you too. Like that of Bengalis like me.

Ever since I grew up into adulthood, I had either lived in West Bengal or lived and worked in the Northeast where I not for once even realised that I happen to be a Bengali by birth. Till, I moved over to New Delhi in the second half of 1998.

The first major incident, if you can call it one, happened when Amartya Sen was awarded the Nobel Prize for economics. “Must be a proud moment for you,” was a remark that greeted me next morning at the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) where I was working at the time. It came from a colleague. “Shouldn’t it be a proud moment for all of us?” I asked a bit defensively, for a moment wondering if this fella didn’t consider himself to be Indian by any yardstick. “Arrey, he is Bengali, no?” I didn’t have a Bengali identity till then, I had one dumped on me that morning. That day onwards I became a ‘non-resident Bengali’ working in New Delhi. Such diversity in our Constitutional unity! You may be born Bengali by default, yet you have this Bengaliness thrust upon you by others.

Over the years in the country’s capital, I have been subjected to all kinds of profiling on basis of my being a Bengali. Let me share some experiences.

  1. People take it for granted that you are a fishy, I mean fish-loving character.They seem to be shocked, surprised, tickled pink all at once when told on their face that I, indeed, am not one. They find it hard to digest this fact for some drawn-out reasoning on their part. On the other hand, I cannot comprehend why being a Bong one has to have fish, come hell or high water. That makes it more arduous for me to rationalise to such people that I cannot stand either the taste or the smell of fish. That I don’t take to fish, like fish take to water. Some even take umbrage and call me an apostate sicne I don't have maachher jhol. Huh.
    What I feel like doing in such circumstances: Tearing my hair.
  2. People are equally cocksure that you will devour sweets by the tonne. Oh yes, I do have a sweet tooth, but not so much that I will have sweets before dinner, after dinner, and at dinner. I must be quite a tasteless sweetheart, isn’t it?
    What I feel like doing in such circumstances: Going on a hunger-strike.
  3. People are dead sure that you are a Commie and out to unfurl the red flag all over the country. Oh yes, I am left-of-centre, but that doesn’t mean I am a commissar either. Oh yeah? Left-of-centre, and Commie, what’s the difference, they will ask like naïve schoolchildren. Everywhere outside West Bengal, especially in New Delhi, apparently you are a Commie unless proven otherwise.
    What I feel like doing in such circumstances: Banging my head against a wall.
  4. People will ask you what you feel about Sourav Ganguly. It doesn’t matter if I tell them that my interest in cricket waned ages back and that I see no difference between a Dhoni and a Gony. But a no for an answer is something they don’t take. You don’t feel proud (when Ganguly’s going great guns)? Or, you don’t feel discrminated against (when Ganguly is dropped)?
    What I feel like doing in such circumstances: Whacking a cricket bat on their heads.
  5. People assume you are soooooooooo intelligent. Intelligence, my two feet! Four decades and on in this world and I am yet to find any empirical evidence to prove that all Bengalis are soooooooooo intelligent. I keep meeting all kinds of people from all walks of life, here and there. I know of soooooooooo many non-Bengalis who are supremely intelligent. And soooooooooo many Bengalis who have not an iota of intelligence dwelling anywhere inside their thick skulls. Leaving aside the pseudo-intellectual bullshit of soooooooooo many other Bengalis, of course. We Bongs even have a wonderful word for that – aantlami.
    What I feel like doing in such circumstances: Stomping my feet in despair.

I am sure people from other parts of the country would have similar, maybe funnier, maybe more exasperating, experiences to share. So far, the going for me in New Delhi has been hilarious in some ways, annoying in some.

If anything angers me, it is the way people pronounce my first name even after being politely told the correct one. Now, why should S-U- be pronounced as "shu" is what they irksomely ask as if I have a major problem with the Queen's language. My retort to such phonetic pseudo-Anglophile freaks is: how do you pronounce 'sugar' which begins with S-U-? They mouth \ˈshu̇-gər\ and shut the hell up.

But then again, the danger I see lies in the future. We, after all, live in times where one kind of ethnic chauvinism begets, perpetuates, and protracts another. I only have so much Bengali pride in me as one can have as a token of self-respect. Period. I hope I never have to assert a Bengali identity as a counter-measure.

PS: I love ethnic jokes, including the rib-tickling ones about Bengalis.

Max Martin (not verified) says:
[August 28, 2008; 10:55 AM]
Dear Subir, As they say you are what you eat. Of course derisive comments and stereotyping are out. But then if you associate the French with their red wine or Bangalore's desi techies with masala dosa, I think such things are pardonable if done in the righ spirit. I find it really interesting how eating habits contribute to a people's cultural definition.... I think we can debate it a bit - if you are game. Cheers Max
Babiita Basu (not verified) says:
[August 29, 2008; 09:13 PM]
well eating habits do construe cultural definition even in the west - what about the fish-n-chips englishman and the great american cereal breakfast? stereotyping follows in india because it's a large country where each province is culturally unique.
Kajal Basu (not verified) says:
[August 30, 2008; 01:17 AM]
Subir, I eat fish only because it's white meat and because of its Omega-3 fatty acid content, not because I was born into a Bengali family, which was a long-domiciled one, in any case, and culturally so confused that they didn't know their posteriors from their elbows. And I eat only some subspecies. I have no quarrel with some Indians flubbing the intelligence test by declaring that since I eat fish, I must be intelligent, and because they quaff ghee, they're the physically stronger subethnics. I live in Kolkata now, and I know Sikhs and Malayalees who've lived here so long that they speak nothing but Bengali and consider themselves entirely acculturated and assimilated. They show no anxiety about their identity. I consider myself part Punjabi, part Bengali, part Marathi, part Spanish and almost entirely English. If anyone joshes me about my Bengali-ness, I tell them to take a flying eff in the language they speak. Your identity lies not in someone else's eyes: it is in what YOU perceive yourself to be. The rest is unimportant. The point here is: If you are ticked off by being treated as a Bengali stereotype, perhaps you need to dig deeper about why that bothers you at all.
Nabina Das (not verified) says:
[August 30, 2008; 05:52 AM]
Interesting! I've been thinking and writing a note along these lines and had it uploaded on my blog only now... The truth is, fish eating for me is as normal as my love for red wine and I like stinky unpasteurised cheese as much as I dig Shutki Maach! I am as intelligent as my Canadian neighbor and as dumb as all of us can be. I have acquired Punjabiyat not too long ago and is often thought of as an Arab or Mexican... Love it! Do check out my post: "Of Identity and Living in Imagined Communities" (http://fleuve-souterrain.blogspot.com/2008/08/its-interesting-thought-how-identity.html) Comments are appreciated.
Kousani Roy (not verified) says:
[August 30, 2008; 01:11 PM]
I remember an incident from my childhood. We hired an auto in Brindavan to go around the city. A young taut jumped and sat in the back. I shouted this is a reserved auto. He had to leave it and then he retorted "Bangali Machhli Khata Hain!" It was kind of hate remark! But we were very amused! I am proud that I am a Bengali, and I just can't live without fish! I don't understand the term "Bong" properly, as far as I know it started as slang in campuses, and now everybody is using it. "English men" are Poms for Aussies, but I don't think the English people themselves will use it to describe themselves. About the brain and fish connection, I don't remember properly..but I have read some articles that fish has some advantages over meat or chicken to develop brain.
Subir Ghosh (not verified) says:
[September 6, 2008; 02:56 PM]
maxie: this thread had somehow slipped through my mind. but my reactions, nonetheless: i) i may or may not be what i eat, what is definite is that i don't eat what i am expected to eat. ii) agreed that such things are pardonable when done in the right spirit. we keep on doing that with each other, don't we? iii) yeah, eating habits do contribute to cultural definitions. but that cannot be the end of it all. as kajal says, his eating fish has nothing to do with his being or not being a bengali. my point too, in a different way: the fact that i don't eat fish doesn't mean than i am not a bong. kajal: i agree with what you say in the first part. i would need to do some soul-searching if i were either ashamed of being a bengali, or if i were to be as confused as the ABCDs. nabina: your piece made interesting reading. probably similar reactions in a different context. kousani: we came across the 'bong' term in the early eighties. if i remember right, it was an import from the IITs. beyond that i don't know much of the word's etymology. kajal may be a better person to comment on this. yeah, i think it must have had a derogatory connotation. now the string has been taken out to quite an extent i believe. doesn't make an eff of a difference.
Nabina (not verified) says:
[September 7, 2008; 09:05 PM]
Subir, even I like chingri a lot! some times more than other "maach"... ABout Sulekha, I haven't blogged there a whole lot. Some of my articles on Sulekha are also on my blog www.fleuve-souterrain.blogspot.com Besides, I'm FB-ing most of the times! Hope you eat some good golda or bagda chingri on your B'day!! nabina

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.