Subir Ghosh: There is a perceptible difference between the talks of the Sixties and that of the Nineties. What lessons did you learn from the previous discussions so that the current negotiations are not abortive once again?
Thuingaleng Muivah: I would rather say that to quite an extent our approach last time had not been genuine. It was not, objectively speaking, to the point.
SG: Except the NSCN chairman Isak Chishi Swu - the factor common to the two rounds of talks - everything else is different.
TM: The general feeling of the people too is different this time. On has to, many a time, follow the wishes of the times. This time the feeling was that we should also try to understand the difficulties of the Indian government. So we are also trying to understand their problems when it comes to our relations with them.
SG: You outright rejected the idea of a Bhutan-type protectorate arrangement. Why?